3.2 C
New York
Thursday, December 1, 2022

Buy now

IND vs PAK – Men’s T20 World Cup 2022

According to Anil Kumble and Stephen Fleming, Virat Kohli’s undefeated 82 who sank Pakistan in Melbourne had two notable features. First, the ability to find boundaries at will in the second half, and second, exhibiting high fitness levels that are critical to maximizing the number of points on a terrain the size of MCG.

At one point, Kohli had 15 of 23 balls. He hit 67 runs from his next 30 deliveries, 36 runs from his last 11. He finished in an unbeaten 82 of 53, including six fours and four sixes, to help India put the ghosts of 2021 behind when Pakistan defeated them on the T20 World Cup by ten wickets.

“What has changed Virat over the past two years in what we see him doing now is that change in his mind in terms of when to bring those boundaries into the second half of his game and that’s exactly what he did,” Kumble said. on ESPNcricinfo’s T20 Time Out post-match analysis show. “He did that with Shadab [Khan]he did that to [Mohammad] Nawaz, he hit a six after Hardik [Pandya] hit a six.

“He realized that’s over” [12th over from Nawaz that went for 20 runs] had to be a big over and that’s where the momentum shifted [for him].”

While Kohli called his own post-game innings his “best in T20Is”, Kumble called it a “perfect innings”. He also said that the presence of Hardik Pandya on the other side in their 113-run partnership complemented Kohli’s style of play. Hardik finished 40 off 37 balls and fell over at the start of the 20th.

“I thought so [the innings] was to perfection because Hardik was on the other side and Hardik took all the pressure in those middleovers and hit important boundaries, especially with the spinners,” Kumble said. “That had kind of been his curse a few years ago. Especially in the middle overs, hitting boundaries, hitting sixes against spinners.”

From the time Kohli and Hardik got together in the seventh over with the score 31 for 4, to when R Ashwin hit the winning runs of the final installment of the game, Kohli took part in running 39 singles, eight twos (including two runs run off a wide pitch) and one three (the freestyle hitting his stumps in the 20th over). Since the start of the 11th over, Kohli would play just four dots.

“The condition while running between the wickets was fantastic,” said Fleming, the former New Zealand captain and current Chennai Super Kings head coach. “He’s getting a little older, but in order to keep that intensity, he’s always had an intensity around him, but running between the wickets was vital.

“Those are the little things you don’t see and they upped the ante with that and they wrecked quite a few runs, which put pressure on the Pakistani players. That intensity is what I like about Virat Kohli. It’s not just the magic shots like the six he had [against Rauf]it’s the things in between, and that’s skill, it’s experience, and it’s greatness.”

Both pundits also believed that Pakistan made mistakes with the ball from the back when they wanted to close the game. Kumble felt that Nawaz transitioned to bowling in the 20th with his classic Orthodox twist on the left arm, while Fleming felt that Haris Rauf – who allowed in the penultimate over 12 of his last two deliveries – missed a trick by failing for the tried-and-true time. to go death-overs plan to bowl the Wide Yorker.

“When you bowl those kinds of overs, you take the spin away from… [the batter]’ said Kumble. “Nawaz never looked into bowling the classic left-arm twist. He more or less bowled an armball – and then you know Hardik was looking forward to hitting through midwicket – but he never tried to hit the deck with spin, which he did very well in the first three overs he threw. I think that’s the beauty of the game. Those are the nerves that tell you and also some baggage of what happened in the last game against India when he knocked over the last one in the Asian Cup.”

“I’m talking about the wide yorker because if you need a border or sixes it’s very hard to hit the wide yorker if you can deliver it [right]. And I’ve seen him do it on great broad borders that can be protected,” Fleming said of Rauf. “It was a tactic that was not used by either side, which surprised me. Especially when you’re ahead of the game and Pakistan ahead of the game. They were in charge of that game.

“India had to hit sixes to get back into the game and win it. So you bowl the best ball and the method of being right [in these conditions] was back from a length but still use the wide yorker… at no stage did they go wide. Haris Rauf, I thought he could have been a little more proactive with that and we might have seen a better result [for him]. But look, this is all in hindsight, he had brought a beautiful spell.”

Source link

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected


Latest Articles