15.7 C
New York
Saturday, October 1, 2022

Buy now

SC denounces hate speech on media platforms and more | What made news in SC today

Here’s a summary of all the top developments related to the Supreme Court in the past 24 hours.

SC SLAMS HATES SPEECH ON MEDIA PLATFORMS, SAYS STRICT LAW NECESSARY TO REGULATE TV DEBATES

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stressed the need for tougher mechanisms and harsher penalties to regulate television debates. The court came down hard on TV news channels that allow hate speech in their debates, saying the role of the TV anchor is very important in moderating such deviations.

Judges KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy’s bench also asked the Center why it remained a mute spectator in this scenario. “Press freedom is important to a nation, and we need to know where to draw the line,” the bank noted.

SUPREME COURT TO LIVE STREAM CONSTITUTION BENCH PROCEDURE FROM SEPTEMBER 27

India’s Supreme Court in its full session on Tuesday decided that constitutional cases will be streamed live from September 27. Sources familiar with the subject said the meeting of all Supreme Court justices passed a resolution to live stream key constitutional bank cases.

The live broadcast will start at the Court of Justice DY Chandrachud, who will hear the Maharashtra political crisis case. Sources said the NIC team was in the process of providing the live broadcast on YouTube. Last week senior advocate Indira Jaising wrote to CJI UU Lalit for live streaming of constitutional cases.

HIJAB FORBIDDEN NOT EQUAL TO CHANGE THE ISLAMIC FAITH

Karnataka’s government on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that banning the hijab is not equivalent to changing the Islamic faith, as wearing the headscarf is not an essential religious practice.

“The fact is that not wearing hijab will not change the color of religion. It cannot be said that the Islamic faith will change without hijab. It is not a binding practice,” Karnataka Attorney General P. Navadgi argued for the highest court.

The court heard arguments over a series of petitions challenging the decision of the Karnataka High Court refusing to lift the hijab ban in state education institutions that have prescribed uniforms.

SC DIRECT DELHI JUDGE TO HEAR ED TRANSFER IN SATYENDAR JAIN Money Laundering Case on SEPT 22.

Underlining that the freedom of the person is more important than anything else, the Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the Delhi director and the trial judge to rule on Thursday (September 22) on the enforcement directorate’s (ED) plea to transfer the money laundering of money. case against AAP minister Satyendar Jain to a new judge.

At an urgent hearing called by senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, who appeared on Jain’s behalf, a three-judge court headed by Judge DY Chandrachud asked the chief judge to hear and decide the case himself tomorrow.

NIIRA RADIA TAPES CASE: CBI SAYS HIGH COURT NO CRIME FOUND IN TAPE CONVERSATIONS

After 12 years, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has informed the Supreme Court that no crime has been found following an investigation into former corporate lobbyist Niira Radia’s taped conversations with politicians, industrialists and government officials. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya

Bhati, who appeared before the CBI, informed a bank headed by Judge DY Chandrachud of a sealed report filed by the agency in 2015 regarding the outcome of the court-ordered investigation. The CBI filed its report on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea and demanded an investigation into the leaked audio tapes with Radia, which it believes constituted a violation of his right to privacy.

— ENDS —

Source link

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
3,506FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles